102-Mas’alah: Fazail-e-HUSAIN r.a aur YAZEED kay 3-Buray KERTOOTON kay Jhootay DIFA ka TAHQEEQI Jaiza

  • Playit.PK
  • Tune.PK
  • Youtube
  • Download



Untitledmp41
Untitledmp41
Untitledmp41
Note: Please do not play video tabs simultaneously.

Check Also

164-Mas’alah : Labbaika Ya RasooLALLAH (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) say motalliaq Saheh Aqeedah ???

6 comments

  1. Assalaamualykum…. ali bhai sahaab u r doing well for islaam i saw ur all video lactures
    u did great job….

  2. MaashaAllah. Keep up the good work brother. I find yours and Mualana Ishaq’s contributions invaluable. May Allah help you and guide you further in making the truth apparent.

  3. asslamo alikum
    ali bhai app apni sooch ky mutabiq jo masyle sahaba r.a ko paeesh aye byan karty han
    our dsri sooch woh hy jo abdula bin umar r.a ki hy jiss tara app ny hawala dia ameery muawia r.a
    ny ibny umar r.a ……..ki taraf ISHARA karky kiss ky bap me jurat hy

    pahli bat iss me ishara ky lafaz nahe han our dosri jo sab sy bari bat hy ibny umar r.a ki me musalmano
    me intshar ki wajha sy KHAMOOOOSH hon

    to app sy poochny ka mera maqsad siraf ya hy k agar aik SIHABI jo wahan majood tha jiss ki taraf baqool app ky ishira kia gya jab woh in ameery muawya r.a par nahe bolye to app aj in masloon ko kion utha rahy han.

    kia app nahe samghty jo app ka MATTO our MANSHOOR hy k FIRQA PARASTI sy balatar.?
    mery khial me firqy ki bheent to app be charh rahy han SHIA ko razi karky yahe to firqa parasti hy

    me nahe samghta k app ki bat sun ky shia NARAAZ hon …..agar ya firqy ko hawa dyna nahe to our kia hy

    mughy umeed hy app meri bat ka bura nahe many gy our jawad be dengy.

    • Butt sahab, jawab men deta hun.

      Jb Huzoor S.A.W. ne Nabi hony ka dawa kia to us sy pehly koi firqa bandi nahi thi, halanky Yahudi, Isaaee or Mushrikeen sb mil kr rehty thy. Lekin apk Dawa e Nubuwat se sb bilbila uthy, sbne mukhalfat ki. So, agr Haqq byan krny se mukhalfat hoti ha to so bismillah.

      Acha, ab agr Shia gaalian dety hen to us se ikhtalaaf nahi hota? Brelvi jo shirk krty hen, ya jo Gustakhian krty hen,, kia aaj koi Ikhtalaf nahi?

      Mera khyal ha jitni firqa parasti aaj ha shaed hi kabhi pehly ho. To is men agr ek banda uth kr Ahle-Bait ka difa kr raha ha (jo k ain Ahadees k mutabiq ha) to konsa “Fitna” apko nazr aa raha ha?

      Masla siraf aik ha.
      Jb kisi ko jawab na aie to wo idher udher ki thamak toyan marta ha. Bjae k Ali bhai ki baaton ka ilmi jawab dya jae, ye kehna shuru kr dety hen k esi baaten na kro.
      —————————————-

      Ab agli baat.
      Hazrat Abdullah Bin Umar ki taraf isharay wali baat.
      BHai apne Hadees puri nahi pari. Usi hadees men ha k pher Abdullah Ben Umar se pucha gya k apne Ameer Muyawia ka jawab kyun na dya………?
      to is se saabit hota ha k unhi ki tarf ye baat ki gae. Arabic text ka taste ho to context sara smj aa jata ha.
      Ameer Muyaviah ne unki trf apna sir ghuma kr baat ki.

      Chalen is baat ko bhi choren. Kia Ammer Moyawiah R.A. ne baqi sb baaten bhool gae aap?
      Gold pehen’na, raisham ka libaas pehen’na, Baity ki bait k liye talwar ka istimal krna, or Ali R.A. per laanat krna……?

      “Husain maawan roz ni jamm diyan” said Ali Mirza. (Subhan’Allah).

  4. Bismillahirrehmanir raheemKustuntunia(constantinople) ke jihad se related sahih bukhari ki jo riwayat pahle jagahon par bahas me aa chuki hai, jis me yah khush khabri di gayi hai ki is jihad me shareeq hone wale log bakshe hue hain, lekin itihaas(history) ki purani kitaben is baat par sahmat hain ki is jihad ke ameer lashkar yazeed bin muawiya they, is silsile me sab se pahle musnad ahmad ki ek riwayat hai jisme saaf tarah se bayan hai ki-” Is qustuntunia ke lashkar ke ameer jisme hz abu ayyub ansari (ra) bhi shareeq they, yazid bin muawiya they”(musnad ahmad)Isi tarah purani kitabon jaise ibne saad (230H) Ki Attabqatul qubra, ibne zarir tabri (310H) ki tarikhul umm wal muluq (part 4 page 173) aur khalifa bin khayyat (240H) kitaareekh (part 1 pg 196) me is jihad ke baare me yazid bin muawiya ki shirqat ka jikr is andaz hi se hai ki wah ameer e lashkar they, yah to nayi aur purani taareekhen hai . Baad ke itihaaskaaron(historian) me hafiz ibne kathir (rh) (774H) Ka jo darja hai, wah batane ki zarurat nahi unhone apni tareekhki mashoor kitab al bidaya wan nihaya ki bahut se jagahon par iska khulaasa kiya hai,(part 8 pg 59) par musnad ahmad ki riwayat bhi naqal ki gayi hai aur page 58 par hai ki hz abu ayyub ansari ra ki wasiyatke mutabik un ki namaz e janaza yazid ne padhai(AL BADAYA WAN NIHAYA PART 8 PAGE 58,59)Isi part ke page 151 par likha hai ki hz hussain ra bhi us lashkar me maujood they(page 151)Aur page 229 me yazid rh ke haalat me yahi likha hai ki wo us lashkar me maujoodthey(badaya wan nihaya pg 229)Isi tarah ibne abdul barr(463H) Ki kitab ” al istiaab fi maariftil ashab” part 2 page 157, imam suhaili rh (581H) ki oranjul anf (sharah seerat ibne hisham) 2nd part page246, haafiz ibne hajar ki kitab “al asaba fi tamijussahaba” part 2 page 90 me isi haqiqat ka munazara Kiya gaya hai, iske elawa sharah bukhari “fath ul bari” part 6 page 125, (tawa darus salam) aur”umdatul qari” me bhi hadith ( yaghzuroona madinata qaysara) ki tafseel karte hue likha gaya hai,Hadith aur tareekh ke in tamam hawalon se yah baat suboot ko pahunch jaati hai ki jis lashkar ke baare me rasoollullah sws ne”maghfurul lahum” (wah bakhsha huwa hai) farmaya hai us ke ameer yazid bin muawiya ra hi they.Is tareekh ke jawab me kuch log yazid ko is khush khabri se darkinar karne ke liye kahte hain ki is lashkar ke ameer hz sufiyan bin auf they, yazid na they, lekin taareekhi daleelen is raaye ka difa(baatil hona) karti hain, jaisa ki hawala di gayi ibaarton se saaf hai,shayad aise logon ke saamne ibnul aseer (630H) ki al kaamil aur ibne khaldun (808H) ki taareekh hai agar unke bayanon se bhi unki raaye poori nahi hoti,Ibnul aseer ne is silsile me likha hai ki-” Hz muawiya ra ne Kustuntunia ki taraf ek badi fauj bheji, hz sufiyan bin auf ko us ka ameer banaya aur apne ladke yazid ko bhi us fauj me shamil hone ko kaha lekin wah saath jaane ke liye taiyyar na huwa, lashkarwahan pahuncha aur khabar aayi ki wah musibaton se do chaar ho gaya hai is par yazid ki marzi ke mutabik bade lashkar me badhotri(increment) ki jisme hz ibne abbasra, hz ibne umar ra, ibne zubair ra, aur abu ayyub ansari ra etc bahut se log they”(TAREEKH IBNUL ASEER PART 3 PAGE 227)Tareekh ibne khaldun me bhi (shayad) aisi hi baat likhi hai(part 3 page 9, taba bairut 1971)1- Ye dono kitabein baad ki hain jabki purani taareekh me yazid hi ko lashkar ka commander batlaya gaya hai jaisa ki pahle saare hawale darj kiye ja chuke hain.2- Ibnul aseer aur ibne khaldun ke bayan kiye gaye dalail ko agar pahle historian ki dalail ki roshni me dekha jaaye to is me sirfitni zyadati milti hai ki yazid se pahle Ek lashkar sufiyan bin auf ki commandari me bheja gaya lekin iske bawajood wah lashkar ko kaarakardgi na dikha saka jiske baad yazid ki commandari me wah lashkar bheja gaya jisne wahan jaakar jihad kiya aur yun yazidi lashkar ki kustuntunia ke jihad ka pahla vijeta(winner) aur nabi (sws)ki khush khabri ko sahi tahraya gaya, isi ke saath tamam historian ka yazid ki ko us kustuntunia ke lashkar ka commander qaraar dena bilkul sahi hai, aur ibnul aseer aur ibne khaldun ki jaankaari bhi uske khilaf nahi, jabki isme ek baat ki zyadati(increment) bhi hai, lekin is zyadati se yazid ko is gaurav(greatness) se door karne ki koshish be buniyaad hai, yah baat to khud ibnul aseer ne apni zehan me bhi nahi thi jiska saaf saaboot yah hai ki unhone apni kitaab Asudul gaaba me yazidhi ko kustuntunia ke lashkar ka commander likha hai(usdul gaaba part 2 page88- part5 page 145 taba old translation, abu ayyub ansari

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *